FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT ENH IAT
Forgery Financial Instrument Enhanced in Texas: what bail is set at, how often a personal bond is granted, and what usually happens to the charge.
What “FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT ENH IAT” means
Texas Penal Code § 32.21 defines forgery: with intent to defraud or harm another, making, altering, completing, executing, or authenticating a writing so that it purports to be what it is not, or passing, publishing, or possessing such a writing with intent to utter it. This filing carries the enhancement in § 32.21(e-2): when a forgery graded under the section's instrument-based or value-based provisions is shown at trial to have been committed against an elderly individual, the offense is increased to the next higher category. "Elderly individual" carries the definition in Texas Penal Code § 22.04: a person 65 years of age or older. The "ENH" notation in the courthouse label "FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT ENH IAT" reflects that one-step increase, so a third-degree felony filing under this citation reflects conduct that would otherwise be graded one category lower.
| Charged as | Share of bail records | Possible confinement | Fine | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Third-degree felony | 100% | 2 to 10 years in prison (TDCJ) | Fine up to $10,000 | Penal Code § 12.34 |
Ranges are the statutory maximums for the level; enhancements, prior convictions and plea agreements change what is actually imposed.
Bail for FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT ENH IAT in Texas
Across 555 Texas bail settings for this charge (3 counties, Apr 2022 – Jun 2025), the median cash or surety bond was $5,000 (middle half: $2,000 – $15,000). 0% of defendants were released on a personal bond, and bail was denied in 82 cases. When this was the only charge at booking (68 records), the median was $10,000 and 3% got a personal bond.
| County | Records | Median cash bail | Middle half | Personal bond | Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| El Paso | 129 | $1,000 | $1,000 – $2,000 | 1% | 3% |
| Travis | 64 | $2,000 | $2,000 – $2,000 | 0% | 0% |
| Nueces | 63 | $15,000 | $10,000 – $15,000 | 0% | 68% |
Showing the 3 counties with the most records; use the selector for any county with at least 30. Per-charge bond settings on original magistrations, from Texas OCA bail reporting under SB 6. Bail is set case by case — these are statistics, not a prediction.
Recent FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT ENH IAT cases
| Case | County | Filed | Disposed | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-DCR-113118 | FortBend | Oct 6, 2025 | Aug 24, 2026 | Deferred adjudication |
| 21-F-237 | Bastrop | Jun 9, 2026 | Aug 12, 2026 | Dismissed — refiled or handled in another case |
| 423-F-238 | Bastrop | Jun 9, 2026 | Aug 3, 2026 | Dismissed — refiled or handled in another case |
| 423-F-239 | Bastrop | Jun 9, 2026 | Aug 3, 2026 | Dismissed — refiled or handled in another case |
| 26-00762-5 | Williamson | Feb 11, 2026 | Jul 8, 2026 | Dismissed by the prosecutor |
| F-25-30366 | Dallas | Feb 27, 2026 | Apr 17, 2026 | Dismissed by the prosecutor |
| NA26-268 | Comal | Mar 16, 2026 | Mar 16, 2026 | Dismissed by the prosecutor |
| 25-13136-439-F | Rockwall | Jan 7, 2026 | Feb 26, 2026 | Guilty or no-contest plea |
| 25-1907-K368 | Williamson | Oct 29, 2025 | Feb 24, 2026 | Guilty or no-contest plea |
| 24-10-15429 | Montgomery | Oct 3, 2024 | Feb 18, 2026 | Guilty or no-contest plea |
Related charges
- FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT § 32.21(d)
- FORGERY GOVT/NATIONAL INST/MONEY/SECURITY § 32.21(e)
- FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT >=$2500<$30K IAT § 32.21(e-1)(4)
- FORGERY TO DEFRAUD OR HARM OF ANOTHER § 32.21(c)
- FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT >=$100<$750 IAT § 32.21(e-1)(2)
- FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT >=$30K<$150K IAT § 32.21(e-1)(5)
- FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT >=$750<$2500 IAT § 32.21(e-1)(3)
Charged with FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT ENH IAT?
Find Texas criminal defense attorneys with verified case histories in your county.
Find a Defense AttorneyBail data: Texas Office of Court Administration magistration reports (SB 6), Apr 2022 – Jun 2025. Court outcomes: county district and county clerk records. Statistics describe past cases and are not legal advice; every case is decided on its own facts.