FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT >=$100<$750 IAT
Forgery Financial Instrument at least $100 under $750 in Texas: what bail is set at, how often a personal bond is granted, and what usually happens to the charge.
What “FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT >=$100<$750 IAT” means
Texas Penal Code § 32.21 defines forgery: with intent to defraud or harm another, altering, making, completing, executing, or authenticating a writing so that it purports to be the act of another who did not authorize it, or passing, publishing, or possessing such a writing with intent to utter it. This filing uses the value-based grading in § 32.21(e-1), added in 2017, which applies when the actor engaged in the forgery to obtain or attempt to obtain property or a service. Under § 32.21(e-1)(2), the offense is a Class B misdemeanor when the value of the property or service obtained or sought is $100 or more but less than $750. This value ladder tracks the theft grading scheme and overrides the instrument-based grading in § 32.21(c) through (e) when the forgery was committed to obtain property or a service.
| Charged as | Share of bail records | Possible confinement | Fine | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class B misdemeanor | 100% | Up to 180 days in county jail | Fine up to $2,000 | Penal Code § 12.22 |
Ranges are the statutory maximums for the level; enhancements, prior convictions and plea agreements change what is actually imposed.
Bail for FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT >=$100<$750 IAT in Texas
Across 691 Texas bail settings for this charge (4 counties, Apr 2022 – Jun 2025), the median cash or surety bond was $2,500 (middle half: $1,500 – $5,000). 14% of defendants were released on a personal bond, and bail was denied in 8 cases. When this was the only charge at booking (167 records), the median was $2,000 and 11% got a personal bond.
| County | Records | Median cash bail | Middle half | Personal bond | Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| El Paso | 138 | $3,000 | $3,000 – $3,000 | 49% | 0% |
| Tarrant | 81 | $2,500 | $1,500 – $3,500 | 5% | 0% |
| Taylor | 50 | $1,500 | $1,000 – $3,000 | 0% | 0% |
| Dallas | 33 | $1,500 | $500 – $2,500 | 0% | 0% |
Showing the 4 counties with the most records; use the selector for any county with at least 30. Per-charge bond settings on original magistrations, from Texas OCA bail reporting under SB 6. Bail is set case by case — these are statistics, not a prediction.
Recent FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT >=$100<$750 IAT cases
| Case | County | Filed | Disposed | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M-23-04197 | Dallas | Jul 3, 2023 | Aug 20, 2026 | Dismissed by the prosecutor |
| 2026NPA0834 | Comal | Aug 3, 2026 | Aug 10, 2026 | Dismissed by the prosecutor |
| CR-2025-04926-C | Denton | May 30, 2025 | Jul 27, 2026 | Guilty or no-contest plea |
| M-25-45754 | Dallas | Feb 24, 2026 | Jul 15, 2026 | Guilty or no-contest plea |
| 26-00877-5 | Williamson | Feb 19, 2026 | Jul 7, 2026 | Guilty or no-contest plea |
| 001-86562-2025 | Collin | Jul 28, 2025 | Jul 2, 2026 | Guilty or no-contest plea |
| M-26-00342 | Dallas | May 29, 2026 | Jun 25, 2026 | Guilty or no-contest plea |
| CR-2025-09665-B | Denton | Dec 5, 2025 | May 20, 2026 | Guilty or no-contest plea |
| 26-00210-5 | Williamson | Jan 15, 2026 | May 12, 2026 | Guilty or no-contest plea |
| CR-2026-00606-A | Denton | Feb 5, 2026 | Apr 28, 2026 | Guilty or no-contest plea |
Related charges
- FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT § 32.21(d)
- FORGERY GOVT/NATIONAL INST/MONEY/SECURITY § 32.21(e)
- FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT >=$2500<$30K IAT § 32.21(e-1)(4)
- FORGERY TO DEFRAUD OR HARM OF ANOTHER § 32.21(c)
- FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT >=$30K<$150K IAT § 32.21(e-1)(5)
- FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT >=$750<$2500 IAT § 32.21(e-1)(3)
- FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT ENH IAT § 32.21(e-2)
Charged with FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT >=$100<$750 IAT?
Find Texas criminal defense attorneys with verified case histories in your county.
Find a Defense AttorneyBail data: Texas Office of Court Administration magistration reports (SB 6), Apr 2022 – Jun 2025. Court outcomes: county district and county clerk records. Statistics describe past cases and are not legal advice; every case is decided on its own facts.