FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT >=$750<$2500 IAT
Forgery Financial Instrument at least $750 under $2500 in Texas: what bail is set at, how often a personal bond is granted, and what usually happens to the charge.
What “FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT >=$750<$2500 IAT” means
Texas Penal Code § 32.21 defines forgery: with intent to defraud or harm another, altering, making, completing, executing, or authenticating a writing so that it purports to be the act of another who did not authorize it — a forged check or signed instrument, for example — or passing, publishing, or possessing such a writing with intent to utter it. This filing is graded under § 32.21(e-1), the value-based scheme added in 2017 for forgeries committed to obtain or attempt to obtain property or a service. Under § 32.21(e-1)(3), the offense is a Class A misdemeanor when the value of the property or service obtained or sought is $750 or more but less than $2,500. The value bracket, proved at trial, is what separates this filing from the Class B bracket below it and the state jail felony bracket above it.
| Charged as | Share of bail records | Possible confinement | Fine | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class A misdemeanor | 100% | Up to 1 year in county jail | Fine up to $4,000 | Penal Code § 12.21 |
Ranges are the statutory maximums for the level; enhancements, prior convictions and plea agreements change what is actually imposed.
Bail for FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT >=$750<$2500 IAT in Texas
Across 568 Texas bail settings for this charge (3 counties, Apr 2022 – Jun 2025), the median cash or surety bond was $3,000 (middle half: $2,000 – $7,500). 7% of defendants were released on a personal bond, and bail was denied in 5 cases. When this was the only charge at booking (167 records), the median was $2,500 and 11% got a personal bond.
| County | Records | Median cash bail | Middle half | Personal bond | Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tarrant | 78 | $2,500 | $1,192 – $3,500 | 5% | 0% |
| Ector | 54 | $2,500 | $2,000 – $5,000 | 2% | 0% |
| Dallas | 49 | $1,000 | $1,000 – $2,500 | 0% | 2% |
Showing the 3 counties with the most records; use the selector for any county with at least 30. Per-charge bond settings on original magistrations, from Texas OCA bail reporting under SB 6. Bail is set case by case — these are statistics, not a prediction.
Recent FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT >=$750<$2500 IAT cases
| Case | County | Filed | Disposed | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR-2025-07575-A | Denton | Sep 11, 2025 | Jul 27, 2026 | Deferred adjudication |
| M-23-31452 | Dallas | Mar 21, 2025 | Jul 21, 2026 | Deferred adjudication |
| M-25-45753 | Dallas | Feb 16, 2026 | Jul 15, 2026 | Guilty or no-contest plea |
| 24-3135CR-2 | Hays | Sep 23, 2024 | Jun 23, 2026 | Dismissed by the prosecutor |
| 24-3135CR-2 | Hays | Sep 23, 2024 | Jun 22, 2026 | Dismissed by the prosecutor |
| 006-85154-2026 | Collin | Jun 8, 2026 | Jun 18, 2026 | Guilty or no-contest plea |
| 006-85154-2026 | Collin | Jun 8, 2026 | Jun 18, 2026 | Guilty or no-contest plea |
| CR-2026-00636-A | Denton | Feb 6, 2026 | Jun 15, 2026 | Guilty or no-contest plea |
| CR-2026-02085-C | Denton | Mar 30, 2026 | Jun 8, 2026 | Guilty or no-contest plea |
| M-24-25899 | Dallas | Dec 4, 2025 | May 11, 2026 | Dismissed by the prosecutor |
Related charges
- FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT § 32.21(d)
- FORGERY GOVT/NATIONAL INST/MONEY/SECURITY § 32.21(e)
- FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT >=$2500<$30K IAT § 32.21(e-1)(4)
- FORGERY TO DEFRAUD OR HARM OF ANOTHER § 32.21(c)
- FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT >=$100<$750 IAT § 32.21(e-1)(2)
- FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT >=$30K<$150K IAT § 32.21(e-1)(5)
- FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT ENH IAT § 32.21(e-2)
Charged with FORGERY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT >=$750<$2500 IAT?
Find Texas criminal defense attorneys with verified case histories in your county.
Find a Defense AttorneyBail data: Texas Office of Court Administration magistration reports (SB 6), Apr 2022 – Jun 2025. Court outcomes: county district and county clerk records. Statistics describe past cases and are not legal advice; every case is decided on its own facts.